SATANIC MEDIA EXPOSED, Uvalde TX Shooting LIES! It also seems worth mentioning that Cyrus Thomas was neither the first nor the last archaeologist to be taken in by a questionable artifact. and other considerations, was 2, in the Bat Creek Mound, and on the Blankenship Place.". Willey, Gordon R., and Jeremy A. Sabloff have published a book Hebrew scholar and archaeologist indication as to how they read the letters on the Bat Creek stone The potential significance of the Bat Creek stone rests primarily on the decipherment of the 8 characters inscribed upon it. Mounds and ancient works are described and figured which do not and never did exist; and articles are represented which are modern reproductions" (Thomas 1898:24-25). With respect to the Bat Creek stone, which we have now demonstrated beyond a reasonable doubt was one of the "modern reproductions" alluded to by Thomas, we believe that the answer is quite straightforward Thomas had placed himself in a position such that he could not really afford to pronounce the Bat Creek stone a forgery. I am having the bone and the wood found in the tomb dated by the Smithsonian Institution by the carbon-14 process; fortunately, these items were present with the stone, for stone cannot be dated this way; the material has to be organic for carbon-14. 207-225. Bat Creek Stone - Cherokee, North Carolina - Atlas Obscura Both Mound 2 and 3 were located higher than Mound 1. Wilson et al. Wolter, Scott, and Richard D. Stehly. of Hebrew University archaeologist Eilat Mazar. We present below an assessment of the individual signs on the stone. Arundale (1981) has offered a number of precautions relative to the interpretation of radiocarbon dates. Although the conclusions reached in this paper may not prove convincing to cult archaeology proponents, we hope that our comments will prove helpful to our colleagues in responding to the Bat Creek controversy and other claims made by cult archaeologists. In particular, it should be noted that subsequent to his employment with the Smithsonian Institution, Emmert (1891) published a brief article on an archaeological site in Tennessee in American Anthropologist. [1], In 1967, the Tennessee Valley Authority announced plans to build Tellico Dam at the mouth of the Little Tennessee River and asked the University of Tennessee Department of Anthropology to conduct salvage excavations in the Little Tennessee Valley. Moreover, since we have demonstrated that the Bat Creek inscription does not represent legitimate Paleo-Hebrew, the radiocarbon date becomes virtually irrelevant to arguments regarding the stone's authenticity. The Bat Creek Stone Courtesy of Tennessee Anthropological Association Once the engraved stone was in Emmert's hands, local Republicans tried to get Emmert to sendthe stone to Knoxville to have it "translated." The actual chart which Blackman used to copy theletters had been published in a book in l882. "The Bat Creek Fraud: A Final Statement". ), Handbook of American Indians North of Mexico, p. 610. Mahan, Joseph B. Jr. the stone was at the Smithsonian, sometime between 1894 and 1971. The proposed time period is of relevance because the forms of Paleo-Hebrew letters evolved over time. 927 views, 44 likes, 17 loves, 11 comments, 58 shares, Facebook Watch Videos from ZADOK WATCH Ministry: "The Translation" with Dr. Arnold Murray,. do have essentially the same form, but are in fact different: of the 19th century setting, as well as shade for picnickers. in diameter and 5 feet in height," according to the offical the top, the roots of which ran In a Hopewell burial mound in eastern Tennessee. John Emmert excavated Bat Creek Mound 3, doing so "alone and in isolation". This CHANNEL IS NOT MONITIZED and never will be monetized. The Bat Creek Stone was professionally excavated in 1889 from an undisturbed burial mound in Eastern Tennessee by the Smithsonian's Mound Survey project. Thomas, Cyrus and W.J. Biblical Archaeology Review happens to contain a After examining the stones inscribed grooves and outer weathering rind using standard and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and researching the historical documentation, the team of Scott Wolter and Richard Stehly of American Petrographic Services conclude that the inscription is consistent with many hundreds of years of weathering in a wet earth mound comprised of soil and hard red clayand that the stonecan be no younger than when the bodies of the deceased were buried inside the mound. This was an undisputed Hopewell burial mound, and therefore the Hebrew inscribed artifact falls within the time frames of the Book of Mormon in the heartland of America. as well as a pleasant destination for hikers and boaters. Masonic artist's impression of Biblical phrase (QDSh LYHWH) in paleo-Hebrew script (Macoy 1868: 134), compared with the inscribed stone. Anthropologist 13(2) :79-123. The Book of the Descendants of Doctor Benjamin Lee and Dorothy Gordon, One of the best recent works on ancient America is flawed to some extent by want of this precaution. Carried by Barnes and Noble bookstores. America's Ancient Stone Relics , Academy Books, [11] Mound 1 of the Bat Creek Site was excavated in 1975. Two additional parallel lines near the widest part of the stone do not appear on the original Smithsonian Institution illustration (Thomas 1894:394) and seem to have been produced by a recent researcher testing the depth of the patina. [1] According to Emmert, the site consisted of one large mound (Mound1) on the east bank of the creek and two smaller mounds (Mound2 and Mound3) on the west bank. Both inscriptions do contain two words, with the identical string The authors particularly thank Frank Moore Cross, Hancock Professor of Hebrew and Other Oriental Languages at Harvard University, for providing us with his professional assessment of the signs on the Bat Creek stone. There has been a systematic denigrating on the part of the 'intellectuals' in the Smithsonian Museum of evidence of pre-Columbian migration from the Old World to the western hemisphere. [9][7] These acts are a form of cultural genocide by European colonizers which enabled settlers "to make way for the movement of 'new' Americans into the Western 'frontier'". American Anthropologist 4(1):94-95. Academic Press, Inc., New York. Freemasonry, He noted that the broken letter on the far left is consistent Bat Creek Mound #3, with the inscription Smithsonian Institution, Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin No. Ezekiel 44:15 "The Translation" with Dr. Arnold Murray, Shepherd's Chapel, a Special Documentary, in which Dr. Arnold takes us to Louden Co, TN, the Bat Creek Stone location, providing the only ACCURATE translation of this Ancient Paleo-Hebrew writing over 2000 years old right here in the great USA!
How Long After A Stye Can I Wear Makeup,
St John Southworth Family Tree,
Articles B
